Hancock

Title: Hancock; Cast: Will Smith, Charlize Theron, Jason Bateman, Jae Head; Director: Peter Berg; Producers: Akiva Goldsman, James Lassiter, Michael Mann, Will Smith; Screenwriters: Vincent Ngo, Vince Gilligan; Music: John Powell; Editors: Colby Parker Jr., Paul Rubell; Genre: Action/ Comedy/ Drama/ Fantasy; Cinematography: Tobias A. Schliessler; Distributor: Sony Pictures Entertainment; Location: Los Angeles , California , USA; Running Time: 92 min.;

Technical Assessment: 3
Moral Assessment: 2.5
CINEMA Rating: For viewers age 14 up



John Hancock (Will Smith) sleeps at park benches, swears, is rude, drinks heavily, and is in the words of a little boy an “asshole”. But he is also a superhero of sorts. He’s arrogant but he saves lives; he’s a bum but he can’t tolerate baddies. When on call he doesn’t hide and slip into a signature costume, he simply skyrockets himself, crashing through windows, making a mess of the traffic, leaving downtown Los Angeles like it’s been rocked by a mega hurricane. Half the people adore him; the other half has filed over 600 lawsuits against him for damaged property and injured bodies. One day he saves from sure death a dreamer of a PR man Ray (Jason Bateman) who is stupid enough to get himself stuck on the railroad track with a train zooming up. Grateful for his life, Ray brings Hancock home for a spaghetti dinner, and introduces the superhero to his son (who idolizes Hancock) his wife Mary (Charlize Theron) who can’t seem to stand the sight of the boorish superhuman around the house. What Ray really wants to do is give Hancock an image makeover—to make him look good to the public.

The movie’s trailer and poster claim there are heroes and superheroes (and more superheroes) and then there is Hancock. Or something like that. Which leads the viewer to expect a different kind of superhero—but a superhero nonetheless. So the story brings us this superhero with an issue—or rather with unresolved issues good enough to keep ten psychiatrists employed for life. This movie which is billed as an “action comedy” flick seems two movies in one, but it confuses its own plot, thus it won’t fit in a decent genre. So there are action comedies and action comedies, and then there is Hancock, a hybrid that doesn’t know how to categorize itself. Even the hero doesn’t understand his powers, much less wield them as a hero is expected to. Okay, okay, they said this was not your ordinary superhero movie—but at least give us something superior, so we don’t regret buying a ticket and having nothing left for popcorn. Don’t give us an unidentifiable species that’s half-hearted comedy turning into a half-baked Shakespearean tragedy with no rationale to engage our brains. The CGI is passable, but worthless against all the questions directed at the ethics of the hero.

Is there a race somewhere? A supercontest of sorts where superheroes out to save the world leave in their wake bigger and bigger collateral damage? Who gets to pay for all that mess this sloppy superhero creates? Just count the potholes caused by his landings. Where is this superhuman coming from? Aren’t superheroes supposed to be, at least, respectful of the citizens of this planet? Is it correct for a superhero to traumatize a kid who’s just being a kid? Is it moral to save one and let a hundred others die? Did Hancock’s makers mean to say anyone can be a superhero simply because he happens to be superhuman? What do they want our children to be? Will Smith the actor became famous for being a family-friendly rapper, a good kid in a very popular TV series. Why are they now shaking off his clean image? Do they want our kids to follow this likeable actor to perdition? Many are the ways by which the evil one will try to lure our children into decadence. Beware. If you must allow your 14-year olds to see this movie, tell them Hancock is fictitious, not to be emulated, idolized, or taken seriously.

Wanted

Title: Wanted; Cast: James McAvoy, Angelina Jolie, Morgan Freeman, Terence Stamp, Thomas Ketschmann. Director: Timur Bekmambetov; Writer: Michael Brandt, Derek Haas and Chris Morgan; Distributor: Universal Pictures; Location: USA; Running time: 110 minutes.

Technical Assessment: 4
Moral Assessment: 2.5
CINEMA rating: R 14 (For viewers aged 14 up)

In Wanted, the “Fraternity” is a thousand-year old secret society of assassins whose mission is to rid the world of bad guys. “Kill one, save a thousand” seems to be their motto. Wesley Gibson (James McAvoy) is a nondescript account manager in some New York office ruled by an obese woman with a razor tongue and indefatigable vocal chords. Besides being bullied by this slob of a boss, Wesley is also hen-pecked by his girlfriend who incessantly complains of the night trains chug-chugging by their cheap apartment. As if two ranting women were not enough, the nerdy Wesley also discovers that his best friend and office mate is also seeing his girlfriend on the side. Too naïve and cowardly to stand up for himself, Wesley seems resigned to live a life that leads nowhere. Until Fox (Angelina Jolie) enters the scene—but not to bring sunshine and flowers to Wesley’s dead-end existence. She takes him to Sloane (Morgan Freeman), the head of the Fraternity, who reveals to Wesley that he has the assassin in his genes, being the son of one of their murdered members. It is to avenge the death of his father then that Wesley is to be recruited, motivated and trained.

The plot of Wanted, if a trifle too bloody, vengeful and violent, is simple enough to follow, and seen against the backdrop of comic book fiction may even come across as credible. It’s not hard for everyman to identify with the superbly acted McAvoy character who turns from weakling to super assassin. Its credibility is further established by having Morgan Freeman in the cast—he who is gifted with a hypnotic growl and an aura of omniscience can make poison sound like milk and honey until you thirst for it. And nobody but nobody could have played Fox more believably than Jolie—wielding with elan fantabulous guns half her weight. Her legendary sex appeal needs no dominatrix costumes—it oozes through even a no-frills white mini dress that would have looked like a nanny’s apron on a less stylish actress. Her panache and her expressive face also project her as the perfect “killer of few words.” Kazakhstan-born director Timur Bekmambetov ably pulls off this thriller and succeeds in suspending the viewer’s disbelief with the use of over-the-top stunts and killer-ware: surfing atop speeding trains, guns and bullets with implausible trajectories, supercars that make James Bond’s look like a Matchbox collection.

There’s no stopping them now—action movies that rival computer games in adrenaline stimulation and ingenuity of inventions. It’s possible that even very young children who can wield the (computer) mouse will enjoy the technical aspects of Wanted. Why, even adult viewers would, as long as it’s clear to them that this movie defies the laws of physics and dabbles in gray areas of morality and mortality. Young viewers may not be able to draw the line between fact and fiction, or may be lost in seeing the boundary blurred between right and wrong. And even if there are willing parents who can guide them through this violent and deception-ridden piece of art, why titillate their imagination thus when there is so much still to learn in school and at home about real physics and real justice? For down-to-earth education-cum-entertainment that broadens their horizons, there’s Nat Geo Junior, Animal Planet or Discovery Channel. To help them with their school work, there’s Knowledge Channel. For good old Sunday afternoon family entertainment, put on The Sound of Music DVD, please.

The Warlords

Title: The Warlords; Cast: Jet Li, Andy Lau, Takeshi Kaneshiro, Xu
Jinglei; Director: Peter Chan; Producers: Andre Morgan, Huang Jianxin,
Peter Chan; Screenwriters: Xei Lan, Chun-Tin-Nam, Aubrey Lam; Music: Lean
Ko, chan Wong Wing; Editor: Wenders Li; Genre: Action/Drama/History/War;
Cinematography: Arthur Wong; Distributor: Viva Films, Morgan, and Chan
Films; Location: China; Running Time: 110 min.;

Technical Assessment: 3.5
Moral Assessment: 2.5
CINEMA Rating: For mature viewers 18 and above


Qing General Pang Quingyun (Jet Li) is the only survivor of a very fierce battle fought in 1861 during the Taiping Rebellion against the corrupt Chinese Qing Dynasty. Traumatized, Pang is nursed back to health by a kind peasant Lian (Xu Jinglei). Though their meeting is short--he sleeps with her for a night-- he develops some feeling for her. Soon, Pang falls in with a group of bandits under the leadership of Zhao Erhu (Andy Lau) and his aide Jiang Wuyang (Takeshi Kamashiro). Pang saves Jiang’s life and the three men pledge eternal friendship and blood brotherhood. Pang realizes Lian is Zhao’s wife. Later, Pang persuades the bandits to join the government’s army so they will have food and arms. Actually, Pang’s plan is to take his revenge on a rival general Pang and his men are assigned to what appears as a hopeless as assault on Shi City , yet Pang comes out victorious but at great cost since he had to use a great number of men as shields. Then they are asked to blockade Suzhou City but because this takes so long, the soldiers are hungry and suffer a lot. At this point, Zhao and Pang become gradually estranged because of Pang’s decisions to ruthlessly sacrifice men to win at all costs. Will this brotherhood stand the strain of conflict? How will the illicit relationship between Pang and Zhao’s wife affect the lives of the three “brothers”?

Originally, The Warlords was intended as a remake of the classic The Blood Brothers made by Chang Chek in 1973. But the present film ended up as a
highly budgeted war picture costing $40 million with no stunts and a
minimum of martial arts. Both are inspired by the chronicled assassination
of Gen. Maxinyi by his trusted friend Zhang Wenxiang in 1870. The Warlords also changes the names of the protagonists. The present picture is an epic war drama dressed up in impressive costumes but full of skillfully choreographed battle scenes so ultra realistic that they call to mind the gory heroism of the Spartan’s 300. Peter Chan shows the master’s hand in directing action sequences with thousands of extras wielding different weapons. Images of soldiers suffering and starving in trenches in the 30 minute Sushou sequence have strong emotional impact and may recall stories about 20th century world wars. Visuals are good and the predominance of dirty gray and brown help bring out the bleak atmosphere. Editing is tight but the music scoring is uneven. Originally in mandarin, the dubbed dialog is often difficult to follow. Though the other characters like Andy Law put in good performances, this is Jet Li’s picture. He dominates every scene where he appears and gives justice to his role as a conflicted
warrior and later as a warlord. But he does not have good chemistry with Xu Jenglei; the female protagonist. Their love scenes are very low key though their relationship is important to the outcome of the story.

Viewers who expect The Warlords to entertain them with spectacular war scenes will have their fill. Those with a scholarly bent can also gain insight into Chinese history. Moreover, the film has moral dimensions worth mentioning. For instance, the matter of adultery. Having an illicit relationship with a married person is often regarded in a matter-of-fact manner these days and just simply tolerated. But it does have far-reaching effects (the movie affirms this) that often times are not immediately discernible but these will come to pass. Jet Li’s character is that of an ambitious warrior who makes decisions to attain a goal (here, victory) without taking into account the welfare of others or the human factor. It is true that he has to make difficult decisions because the choices are difficult but this does not justify his killing a group of soldiers(over the issue of food) so others may live. He is so affected by what he does that he even sheds a tear but to him as a military man, it is victory at all costs. In the end, his realized ambition and position of importance are of no use. It is still the same rule. One cannot justify evil means even if the end or goal is good. Definitely this movie is not for the young. The violence is so preponderant that it is overwhelming. Too much exposure of young impressionable viewers to violence desensitizes them so that often their regard for the value of life is diminished.

Journey to the Center of the Earth

Title: Journey to the Center of the Earth; Cast: Brendan Fraser, Josh Hutcherson, Anita Briem; Genre: Adventure; Director: Eric Brevig; Screenplay: Michael Weiss and Jennifer Flackett & Mark Levin; Original Story: Jules Verne; Producer: Toby Emmerich; Distributor: New Line Cinema; Location: US, Europe; Running Time: 92mins

Technical Assessment: 3
Moral Assessment: 3
Rating: For viewers 13 and above


Scientist and Professor Trevor Anderson (Brendan Fraser) and his nephew Sean (Josh Hutcherson), whose father died searching for the center of the Earth when Sean was just a boy, set out somewhere in Europe to find this mystical/mythical place hidden thousands of miles below the Earth’s surface. Circumstances lead them to meet up with Hannah Ásgeirsson, the daughter of a once great scientist who also believed that the center of the Earth does, in fact, exist and Jules Verne’s novel “Journey to the Center of the Earth” was not a work of fiction. She agrees to take them to the mountain top where Sean’s father disappeared and her father did a bulk of his research. Once there, they stumble upon a cave, and by accident, they’re taken directly to the center of the Earth. From there on, they’re into one amazing ride after another as they attempt to escape the amazing yet dangerous lost world—a place loaded with prehistoric creatures, wondrous plant life and other weird phenomena.

Journey to the Center of the Earth is nothing more than a spectacle. Using 3-D technology, the film takes its audience to a fun-filled ride and adventure. The film’s premise though is a bit high-brow and alienates audiences who are not fully aware or knowledgeable of many scientific terms and jargon. Story-wise, the emotional flow is rather flat and predictable. Characters are uninteresting and their relationships are trite. The romance layer is also blunt and audiences may only remain indifferent to the love story up until the end of the movie. Although the effects are spectacular, the movie fails to suspend audience’s disbelief that such a place can actually exist. It is perhaps the fault of the director or a failure in storytelling. But then, taking the movie as a theme park ride, it is still a good watch.

In this mystical place at the center of the earth, there is no mention of whether God exists. Could it be a place where God is not needed, where monsters rule and all the nature endangers human life? The motivation of the characters to dig deep down the earth’s surface is also unclear. Are they trying to look for their loved ones who may be trapped inside? Or is it just ego trip that they can actually find a place and prove theories and speculations more than they can imagine? However, looking into their relationships and the apparent concern for each other, audiences may appreciate furthermore the company of friends, relatives and loved ones. At all times and at all costs, human life must be preserved. Humans are responsible for one another and that is one valuable lesson in the movie. Amidst monsters and dangers, there would always be good-natured creatures that will unconditionally help us go through, carry on and trust in the omnipresent goodness of God. The film is suited even for the very young, however, some images and visual effects may cause trauma if they are not guided and supervised by adults.

Urduja

Title: Urduja; Cast: Regine Velasquez, Cesar Montano, Eddie Garcia, Jay Manalo,Johnny Delgado, Ruby Rodriguez, Eppie Quizon, Michael V., Allan K.,BJ Forbes; Director: Antonio Tuviera.

Technical assessment: 3.5
Moral assessment: 3
CINEMA rating: For general Patronage


Si Urduja (Regine Velasquez) ay isang prinsesang mandirigma mula sa Pangasinan at ang tanging anak ni Lakanpati (Eddie Garcia) ng pinuno ng tribo. Tumatanda at nanghihina na si Lakanpati kung kaya’t pinahayag na nito ang kanyang kagustuhang magkipag-isang-dibdib na si Urduja kay Simakwel (Jay Manalo), isang mapusok na mandirigma, upang may humalili na sa kanya sa pamumuno. Walang puwag sa puso ni Urduja si Simakwel, subali’t desidido ang lalaking mapasa-kanya ang prinsesa at ang tronong iiwanan ng ama nito. Mauunsiyami ang balak ni Simakwel nang magtagpo ang landas ni Urduja at ni Limhang (Cesar Montano), isang matapang na piratang napadpad sa kanilang lugar. Bagama’t sa simula’y mailap si Urduja kay Limhang, unti-unti itong mapapalapit sa pirata mula nang iligtas siya nito sa tiyak na kamatayang dulot ng pana ng isang Badyao. Maraming pagsubok na daraanan si Limhang, dala na rin ng paninibugho ni Simakwel, subali’t isang mapagpitagan at masunuring anak si Urduja.

Ang Urduja ay ang kauna-unahang “full-length animation feature film” ng Pilipinas, at bagama’t hindi pa ito matatawag na “perpekto” kung ihahambing sa mga banyagang animation films katulad ng mga ipinalalabas ng Disney, ipinakikita ng Urduja ang katangi-tanging kakayahan ng mga Pilipinong mangguguhit at “animators”. Sapagka’t ito’y isang pelikula, natural lamang na ang unang punahin ng mga tao sa Urduja ay ang mga imahen, ang kanilang nakikita; pumapangalawa lamang ang kanilang pagpuna sa naririnig, sa tugtugin, sa script, sa dialogue, sa kuwento at sa daloy nito. Akma ang pagpili kay Velasquez bilang Urduja at kay Montano bilang Limhang, lamang, may mga pagkakataong napapalakas ang tunog nila—may diperensiya kaya sa sound system? Sinubukan ng Urduja na gawing kaakit-akit sa madla ang pelikula, kung kaya’t may “kakornihan” ang script at paggamit ng makabagong idiyoma (tulad ng “hindi ko feel” atbp.)o tauhan (si Mayumi na may pagka-kiri) na nagsisilbi lamang na “panira” sa kabuuan ng pelikula. Hindi rin nakakakuha ng simpatiya ng manonood ang daga na si Kukut (Michael V.) at ang tarsier na si Tarsir (Allan K.), sapagkat ang mga boses nila’y hindi bagay sa liit at hitsura nila bilang daga at tarsier; sa halip, tunog-“kanto boys” sila.

Dapat alamin nating mga Pilipino na ang mga cartoons na ating pinapanood mula sa ibang bansa ay gumagamit ng talinong Pilipino, kung kaya’t madaling unawain kung ang Urduja man ay may “lasang banyaga”, na tila pinaghalong Mulan, Pocahontas, atbp. Hindi ganoong kahusay ang Urduja, ngunit bilang unang bunga, may pangakong kipkip ang pelikula. At kahit mestisong-hilaw pa nga minsan ang dating ng pagguhit ng mga imahen, Pilipino pa rin ang inuuwian ng buong pelikula—pansinin ninyo ang isang napaka-Pilipinong sangkap sa pelikula: ang karera ng kalabaw. Sana’y magpaka-husay pa ang mga gumawa nito; kaunti pang pagsasanay at gagaling pa sila. Ang pinakamahalaga ay ang tunghayan ng mga manonood ang lakip na mensahe ng Urduja —ang dangal ng babaeng Pilipina. Bagama’t base ang pelikula sa isang alamat (kung saan wala namang lalaking nakatapat si Prinsesa Urduja), nabuhay nito ang katauhan ni Urduja bilang isang babaeng may matatag na kalooban at paninidigan sa kabila ng kanyang pagiging masunuring anak.

My Monster Mom

Title: My Monster Mom; Cast: Annabelle Rama, Ruffa Gutierrez, JC de Vera, Mart Escudero, Iwa Moto, Eugene Domingo, Khryss Adalia; Director: Jose Javier Reyes; Producers: Jose Marie Abacan, Roselle Monteverde-Teo ; Screenwriter: Jose Javier Reyes; Genre: Comedy; Distributor: GMA Films; Location: Philippines.

Technical Assessment: 2.5
Moral Assessment: 2.5
CINEMA Rating: For viewers age 13 and below with parental guidance

Nagkaanak at iniwan ng nobyo ang noon ay 16-taong-gulang na si Esmeralda (Rhian Ramos). Dahil sa murang gulang ay naduwag si Esmeralda na itaguyod mag-isa ang anak na si Abegail a.k.a Baby Girl (Ruffa Gutierrez) kaya ipinaubaya niya ang pagpapalaki sa kapatid na hindi magka-anak at naninirahan sa Amerika. Nang lumaon, nagkaanak pa si Esmeralda (Annabelle Rama) sa magkaibang ama ng dalawang anak na lalaki sina Buboy (JC de Vera) at Pipoy (Mart Escudero) na mag-isa rin niyang itinaguyod. Maayos na namumuhay ang mag-iina sa kabila ng sobrang pagbubunganga at pagtataray ni Esmeralda sa loob at sa labas ng bahay. Pangunahin kay Esmeralda kapakanan ng mga anak kaya hinihigpitan niya ang mga ito sa lahat ng bagay na lingid sa kanya ay nakasasakal na. Kinaiinisan siya ng mga kapitbahay dahil sa kanyang ugali at di maiwasan na maging usap-usapan ang pagkakaroon ng mga anak sa iba't ibang mga lalaki. Sa tuwing iiral ang pagtataray ni Esmeralda ay nakaagay lagi ang dalawang kaibigan upang payapain siya. Makalipas ang 27 taon ng pagkakalayo ay babalik ang panganay na anak ni Esmeralda na si Abigael mula sa Amerika. Sa kanilang muling pagkikita ay matutuklasan nila ang maraming bagay sa kani-kanilang pag-uugali na taliwas sa kanilang inaasahan.

Katulad ng pamagat ng pelikula, nakesentro ito sa maingay na pangunahing tauhan. Bagamat tagumpay sa paghahatid ng mga linyang patawa ang bidang si Anabelle, lalo na sa mga palitan nila ni Ruffa, ay halata namang wala nang mapipiga ang direktor sa pag-arte ni Rama kahit man lang sa "expression" ng mukha, bagama't minsan ay nakakadagdag sa patawa ang mukha nitong "deadma". Sa isang banda naman ay eksaherado ang pag-arte ng ibang mga aktor, at hinaluan pa nga ng "bading" na alalay para pampadagdag-tawa--kayo na ang humusga kung nakakatulong ito sa pagbabalanse ng mga bagay, sapagka't mantak man naming isiping walang katorya-torya ang dialogue, hindi namin maunawaan kung bakit "biling-bili" ito ng mga nanonood. Iba-iba lang siguro talaga ang panlasa ng tao. Maayos ang disenyo ng produksyon na nagpatingkad sa mga payak na eksena gayundin ang "make-up". Akma rin ang mga tunog at musika na inilapat.

Mahalaga ang kapayapaan sa loob ng tahanan upang maging bukas at maayos na makapag-isip ang mga miyembro ng pamilya. Taliwas ito sa ipinakita ng pelikulang My Monster Mom. Hindi pinapasubalian na tanging kabutihan ang hangad ng ina para sa kaniyang mga anak subalit ang lahat ng tao (di lamang mga ina) ay dapat maging responsable sa paraan ng pagpapakita ng malasakit sa kapwa. Halimbawa dapat bang unahin ng isang ina ang pakikipag-away sa halip na asikasuhin ang anak na bugbog ang katawan at sugatan? Pati mga alagad ng batas ay tikom ang bibig sa reklamo ng panunutok ng baril. Kahanga-hanga naman ang kabababang-loob ng mga anak sa paghingi nila ng kapatawaran dahil nasaktan nila ang kanilang ina gayundin ang pagtanggap nila sa pagkatao nito. Sa kabuuan ay nakakatawa at magaan ang pelikula, subalit dahil sa matalas na pananalita at di karaniwang sagutan ng ina at anak na laking-Amerika ay dapat gabayan ng mga magulang ang mga manonood na kabataan. Isaisip natin na kahit ano pa man ang kagaspangan ng ating ina, dapat pa rin natin siyang igalang at mahalin, bagay na higit pang makakatulong tungo sa kanilang pagbabagong-ugali kaysa kung tatapatan natin ng pagkabastos ang kanilang kagaspangan.

Incredible Hulk

Title: Incredible Hulk Cast: Edwad Norton, Liv Tyler, Tim Roth, Tim Blake Nelson; Director: Louis Leterrier; Screenplay: Zak Penn; Genre: Action, Science Fiction; Location: Brazil and New York; Running Time: 114 mins

TechnicalAssessment: 2.5
Moral Assessment: 3
PG 13

Bruce Banner a.k.a Mr Green's (Edward) continuous search for an antidote for his cure of gamma radiation brings him to Brazil where he lives as “fugitive” while in distant communication with Dr Sterns a.k.a Mr Blue (Tim Blake) with whom he exchanges over internet chatroom on experimental formula for his condition. Back in Washington, General Ross (William)’s interest to search for Bruce is revived when another case of gamma sickness is discovered in an elderly man after drinking a bottle of juice. The juice factory is traced in Brazil where Bruce as a casual worker accidentally cuts his finger and an empty bottle in the assembly line catches a droplet of his blood. This signals the search for Bruce from Brazil to New York. In the middle of the chase, Bruce reunites with his love interest, General Ross’ daughter Betty (Liv Tyler). Bruce reveals to Betty that her father wants to get him to produce more “hulks” to use as weapons. But Bruce only wants to get rid of the gamma in his body.

The film offers a combination of a narrative in an spectacular manner. The plot, while boasting of a good flow, struggles to bring out the emotion. Actingwise there could have been more than mediocre acting of lead actors in the film, the same with special effects applied for the devastation scenes of the hulk. For the most part it appears like an animation film. The rest of the technical aspects particularly the cinematography, musical scoring and sound effects contributed in making the “Incredible Hulk” a worthy film to see.



The character of Bruce in the film shows a person who cares for life and is willing to sacrifice for this cause. He does not want selfish motives of people to take advantage of any form of power to destroy lives. Friendship is also tested during difficult times when full trust, sincere support and presence are necessary. At the end of the day, a dutiful daughter can confront a father for his wrong deeds. A responsible person also knows how to control self when required especially when damages to life is at stake. Overall, the film offers positive values. However, devastation scenes maybe too strong for children 13 years and below, parental guidance is required.


"The information contained in this email message is intended only for the addressee and is not necessarily the official view or communication of the Ministry. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, copy or distribute this message or the information in it. If you have received this message in error, please email or telephone the sender immediately."

The Hottie and the Nottie

Title: The Hottie and the Nottie; Cast: Paris Hilton, Joel David Moore, Christine Lakin, Adam Kulbersh; Director: Tom Putman; Screenplay: Heidi Ferrer; Cinematography: Alex Vendler; Editing: Jeff Melmberg; Producer: Myles Nestel, Victoria Nevinny, et al; Music: David Russo;: Location: Los Angeles, California; Genre: Comedy; Running Time: 91 minutes;

Technical Assessment: 2
Moral Assessment: 2
Cinema Rating: For viewers 18 and above


Nate Cooper (Joel David Moore) is a geeky bum who realizes his one true love is the girl he had a crush on in the first grade after his current girlfriend smashes his guitar on his head. He searches for Christabel Abbot (Paris Hilton) but is horrified to find out that she will not date anyone unless her repulsive and bitchy best friend June Phiggy (Christine Lakin) finds someone special. The condition is impossible since June is not only disgustingly unattractive but possesses a vile personality. Nate tries hard to find a man for June so he can have his way with Christabel, to the extent of paying a man to date June and giving a $2000 gift certificate for a spa make-over so that she will be less nauseating to be with. But his plan backfires when the girls meet a dentist/athlete/model who takes interest in June and eventually starts to fix her.

This is a bad movie—bad plot, bad script, bad acting, bad directing. The concept is unoriginal and poorly interpreted. Hilton and Moore are tormenting to watch and hear. The script is clichéd and has the most idiotic dialogues such as, “life without orgasms is… a world without flowers”. Characters are inconsistent and have no motivation. The storyline develops into a predictably brainless twist. The director seems to care less to produce a decent film than show off Hilton’s skin and curves at every opportunity. One can go on and on with what is wrong with the film that it is better to warn viewers against wasting time and money on this movie.

The Hottie and the Nottie aims to be a movie talking about beauty being skin deep, friendship through thick and thin and true love. The problem is none of these themes are actually seriously developed because the film just kept on raving about Hilton’s beauty and sex appeal and planting offensive and sick jokes about a woman’s ordeal when she is not as pretty and attractive as her co-star. Inconsistencies are extensive. As a movie about learning to look beyond looks, Nate only takes interest in June as soon as she transforms into someone prettier. Conveniently, June only becomes personable when her looks improve as though being nice were attached to looking nice. The seemingly tight and loyal friendship between Christabel and June is questionable because if Chris really cared about her less attractive friend, wouldn’t she have brought her to a dermatologist or cosmetologist and offer to help her look at least hygienic and agreeable. Instead she parades poor June to her suitors only to highlight their contrasting looks and make her appear a caring, down-to-earth friend. And as a story about finding true love, it merely obsesses about sleeping with the attractive hot girl even if one has to lie, intimidate, bribe or coerce. The movie is offending as it bullies people who fall behind the standards of beauty and treats them as a cruel joke. There are plenty of scenes and dialogue about alcohol and sex. This is not recommended for viewing at all.

Serbis

Title: Serbis; Cast: Gina Pareno, Jacklyn Jose, Coco Martin, Kristofer King, Julio Diaz, Dan Alvaro; Genre: Drama; Director: Brillante Mendoza; Screenplay: Armando Lao; Producer: Ferdinand Lapuz; Location: Manila; Running Time: 90mins

Technical Assessment: 3.5
Moral Assessment: 2.5
Rating: For viewers 18 and above


Patuloy na itinataguyod ni Nanay Flor (Gina Pareno) ang kanilang negosyong lumang sinehan na nagpapalabas ng mga lumang “bold” na pelikula sa kabila ng samu’t saring problema nito. Kasama niyang namamahala ang anak na si Nayda (Jacklyn Jose) at manugang na si Lando (Julio Diaz). Sa sinehan na sila nakatira kasama ang iba pang kaanak: sina Allan (Coco Martin) at Ronald (Kristofer King) na projectionist. Labis na dinaramdam ni Nanay Flor ang panloloko sa kanya ng kanyang asawa, kasabay ng pagpasan niya sa problema ng lahat ng kanyang kaanak na tauhan na rin sa sinehan. Si Allan ay makakabuntis na makakadagdag sa pasakit ni Flor. Lingid din sa kanyang kaalaman ang nangyayaring pagse-“serbis” ng mga kalalakihan sa mga parokyanong bakla ng sinehan. At dahil sa sinehan na nakatira ang buong pamilya at kaanak na nagpapatakbo ng sinehan, namumulat ang mga batang apo ni Nanay Flor sa mga bisyo at kalaswaan.

Isang "cinema verite" ang Serbis na makatotohanang naglalarawan ng tila pinaglipasan na ng panahon na kultura: ang mga sinehan at teatro. Naging lugar na lamang ito ng madidilim na sikreto ng nakaraan at kasalukuyan. Pinamahayan na rin ang sinehan ng mga baho, problema at bisyo ng isang pamilyang nasadlak sa kadiliman. Mahusay ang pagkakagawa ng mga eksena na parang nanonood ka lamang ng tunay na buhay. Kung kaya’t naparangalan ng rin ang Serbis sa ibang bansa. Matapang nitong tinalakay ang maraming sakit ng lipunan na naglalarawan sa kalagayan ng mga bansang nasa “Third World” katulad ng Pilipinas. Walang itulak kabigin at hindi matatawaran ang galing ng lahat ng nagsiganap. Maraming biswal na simbolismo na epektibong naisalarawan ang dilim, kasalanan at kasamaan na naikulong sa isang lugar.

Malinaw ang layunin ng Serbis: ang isalarawan ang nakaririmarim na kalagayan ng isang naiibang uri ng pamilyang nasadlak sa kahirapan. Ipinasilip ng Serbis ang isang mundong hindi madalas na makita ng Pilipinong manonood. Isang lugar na alam nating nariyan ngunit hindi binibigyang pansin. Sa kabila ng mga bisyo, kalaswaan at kasamaan, isang bagay ang labis na pinahahalagahan ng mga karakter sa pelikula: ang pamilya. Bagama’t hindi perpekto at puno ng depekto, dalisay pa rin ang pagmamalasakit at pagmamahalan sa isang pamilya. Tahimik din nitong ipinakita ang kakayahan ng isang taong kumawala sa isang masalimuot na sitwasyon kung kanyang nais. Nakababahala nga lamang dahil hindi malinaw kung para saan ba ang pagtakas. Sa pagbabagong tungo sa kabutihan o sa higit pang kasamaan? Sadyang nakababahala ang biswal at grapikong pagpapakita ng mga eksenang hubaran, seks at homosekswalidad. Bagama’t hindi sinasabi ng pelikula na ito ay mabuti, maari pa rin itong makaapekto sa sensibilidad ng mga manonood. Ang pagkakaron ng batang karakter bilang saksi sa lahat nang bisyo at kasalanan sa lugar ay isang epektibong device na nagsasabing malayo pa ang ating lalakbayin sa pagbabago sapagkat iminumulat na natin ang ating mga kabataan sa isang mundong nagdidilim na ang pamantayang moral at bumababaw ang pananalig sa Diyos.

Made of Honor

Title: Made of Honor; Cast: Patrick Dempsey, Michelle Monaghan, Kevin McKidd, Sidney Pollack; Director: Paul Weiland; Producers: Neil M. Moritz; Screenwriters: Adam Sztykiel, Deborah Kaplan, Harry Elfont; Music: Rupert Gregson-Williams; Editor: Richard Marks; Genre: Romance/ Comedy;
Cinematography: Tony Pierce-Roberts; Distributor: Columbia Pictures; Location: New York , USA and Scotland; Running Time: 91 min ;

Technical Assessment: 3
Moral Assessment: 2.5
CINEMA Rating: For viewers 14 and above

For the last ten years after college, Tom Bailey (Patrick Dempsey) and Hannah (Michelle Monaghan) have become best friends. They enjoy each other’s company, laugh at the same jokes, tell each one choice personal experiences. This platonic friendship has endured in spite of their divergent interests and lifestyles. Tom, the handsome and wealthy inventor of the collar for take-out coffee cups, is an inveterate womanizer who attracts and beds a different girl every night (and never the same girl for two successive nights according to his rules), while Hannah is an art restorer who observes all these in bemusement but commenting and is the only good-looking girl in New York he hasn’t slept with. Both seem content with the way things are until Hannah goes to Scotland for six weeks on a business trip. Tom misses Hannah and realizes he is in love with her; he plans to tell her when she returns. But when she does, she brings along Colin (Kevin McKidd), a rugged man, a natural athlete who owns the biggest distillery in Scotland and is of royal lineage. They announce they’re engaged to be married and Hannah, unsuspecting of Tom’s real feelings, asks Tom to be her maid of honor. Tom accepts the invitation and accompanies Hannah to Scotland with the hope that he can think of something to prevent the wedding from pushing through.


It’s true that the good looks and personality of lead actors are a big come-on for the movies and the movie producers are banking on Patrick Dempsey and Michelle Monaghan to do that for Made of Honor but regretfully, as this movie shows, these are not enough. The picture calls to mind the well remembered My Bestfriend’s Wedding because of the similarity in the plot. However, Made of Honor is a bit of a let down because the very predictable plot is also underdeveloped, and so are the characters. There is not much that the viewers can savor between the beginning and the expected ending. Even the cliché of a dashing horseback rescue is not that exciting. The implausible situation is forced or thrust into your face right from the start, for how can a man be a maid of honor? Attempts at humor are crude like Tom’s father negotiating a pre-nuptial agreement with his future 6th (or 7th?) wife as to the number of times she should have sex with him in a week. The acting of the leads is adequate but there is really not much they can do. There is also some chemistry between them so they are able to sustain a light, cheerful mood. Some Scottish wedding traditions presented add to the happy ambience.


A romantic comedy like Made of Honor is meant to be light and entertaining and not to be taken seriously. So at times, negative values are overlooked or accepted due to the fact that they are presented in the guise of jokes or attempts at humor. Such is the matter-of-fact depiction of certain sex practices like the promiscuity of Patrick Dempsey’s character Tom Bailey and the ease of divorce and repeated marriages of Tom’s father. These practices are shown as an accepted way of life in this movie and glossed over by the other characters who are amused by them. These attitudes and practices are contrary to Christian as well as Filipino traditional values. Young people who see this movie should be carefully guided by parents/guardians as ideas these can subtly and insidiously influence the young viewers’ thinking and behavior.

Get Smart

Title: Get Smart; Cast: Steve Carell, Anne Hathaway, Dwayne Johnson, Alan Arkin, Terence Stamp; Director: Peter Segal; Producers: Michael Ewing, Alex Gartner, Andrew Lazar, Charles Roven; Screenwriters: Tom A. Astle, Matt Ember; Music: Trevor Rabin; Editor: Roger Mussenden; Genre: Action/ Comedy; Cinematography: Dean Semler; Distributor: Warner Bros. Pictures; Location: Canada; Running Time: 110 min.;

Technical Assessment: 3
Moral Assessment: 3
CINEMA Rating: For viewers 14 and above

Maxwell Smart (Steve Carell) is the top analyst in CONTROL, a secret intelligence agency presided over by The Chief (Alan Arkin) and set up to annihilate an unscrupulous rival agency, KAOS. CONTROL loses many of its agents when KAOS attacks the former’s headquarters. Just then, Max is promoted from analyst to field operative, and is hence to be known as “Agent 86”. He gets a spy buddy in the person of Agent 99 (Anne Hathaway); the two are assigned to hunt down KAOS’ operative Sigfried (Terrence Stamp). Giving them home base assistance is Agent 23 (Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson) as they venture out as an odd pair flushing out KAOS’ nuclear weapons from their lair. The Agent 86-Agent 99 partnership is spiced up when the bright but bumbling 86 gets the hots for the bright and composed 99, and she eventually responds—but warns him not to trust anyone including herself for she could be a double agent.


Get Smart is the big-screen version of the late-60s TV series designed to spoof James Bond. While younger viewers may not be familiar with the tv version, and it may be too old to be remembered by older moviegoers, Get Smart nonetheless offers a funny and delightfully silly take-off of its boob-tube predecessor. In fact, as a movie, it can stand on its own, even though today’s moviegoers couldn’t care less where it’s coming from. Carell’s comedic timing is perfect as a spoofy and extremely lucky agent, with looks to match; he’s actually an urbane and much better-looking Ben Stiller. Hathaway’s character, on the other hand, is tailor-made for her—the tough nut beneath the fragile-looking, appealing female—we can’t imagine Angelina Jolie as Agent 99 and getting away with it. The plot is quite simple to follow, thus the action and the funnies, if sometimes a bit physical, are not shoved under a tiresome, convoluted web of a story.


What harm can be done by a spy movie that seeks to make you laugh more than it wants to make you think? Likewise, is there much good it can do even though it pits the bad guys against the good guys? Get Smart is entertainment, an enjoyable comedy with action and dialogue that might even elicit a belly laugh or two from the audience. The emphasis is on comedy, so that even the romantic element (between Agents 86 and 99) is played down and hardly felt, in fact. If the whole family can watch only one movie this week, let it be … maybe Kung Fu Panda; otherwise, Get Smart is okay for viewers aged 14 and above.

Altered

Titled: Altered; Cast: Adam Kaufman Catherine Mangan, Paur McCarthy-Boyington, Brad William Henke, Mike Williams, James Gammon, Misty Rosas; Director: Eduardo Sanchez; Producers: ; Screenwriters: Jamie Nash, Eduardo Sanchez; Music: Tony Cora, Exiquio; Editor: Michael Cronin; Genre: Horror; Cinematography: Steve Yedlin; Distributor: Rogue Pictures; Location: Florida, USA; Running Time: 90 min.;

Technical Assessment: 3
Moral Assessment: 2 ½
CINEMA Rating: For viewers 14 and above

Three friends, Cody (Paur McCarthy-Boyington), Duke (Brad William Henke) and Otis (Mike C. Williams), succeed in capturing an alien in the middle of the forest . Not knowing what to do, they take it to the house of a common friend Wyatt (Adam Kaufman). Later on, it is revealed that all of them were abducted by the same aliens 15 years ago, and Cody’s brother Timmy failed to return. With the alien in captivity in Wyatt’s garage,Cody wants to kill it in revenge for Timmy but Wyatt argues that this will only bring the other aliens after them. But the captured alien succeeds in taking over Wyatt’s girlfriend, Hope’s (Catherine Mangan) mind and then infecting Cody with its bite, causing him to start mutating. With tension between the members of the group rising, Wyatt thinks that the aliens, who left him altered in some way during their abduction before,have returned for him, despite his attempts to hide and run away.


Altered pales in comparison with its director’s hit horror flick, The Blair Witch Project. This time, there is a certain amount of gore and a real alien is seen in the movie. The attempt is not a total failure though for it is able to evoke a certain amount of fear from the audience. But the script is a bit talky for a horror film and the excitement fails somewhere in the middle. The film is able to catch up towards the end. However, the “altered” subplot or main plot remains to be ambiguous in the entire storytelling. The acting is commendable and all characters are consistent up to the very end. Given the apparent limited resources of the film, it is impressive that it is able to come up with effective visual effects and true-to-form aliens.


Altered is another horror, sci-fi thriller focusing on the presence of aliens on earth. This time, they are more than just external forces but they have turned into internal monsters that haunt every human being they encounter. Self-preservation and survival is a human instinct and there is still no clear cut moral argument as to how humans should treat aliens. In case human life is in danger, it may be morally acceptable to kill a creature that harms, but how can we be certain that humans have not also violated the aliens in any way? It is remarkable to note how the characters in Altered have turned into savages both for survival and revenge. In the end, Altered is about the various “aliens” inside every human being. Some may have destroyed us, the more sophisticated ones may have altered us, but ultimately, with faith and perseverance, we all can win over these aliens since the human being, still, is made superior over any other creatures. The very young audiences should be guided while watching, given the horror, gore, violence, sexual content, alcoholism and strong language used in the film.

The Happening

Title: The Happening. Cast: Mark Wahlberg, Zooey Deschanel, John Leguizimo, Ashlyn Sanches, Betty Buckley, Spencer Breslin, Robert Bailey, Jr., Frank Collison, Jeremy Strong, Alan Ruck, Victoria Clark Director and Writer: M Night Shayamalan Location: United States, India Running Time: 90 minutes

Technical Assessment: 3

Moral Assessment: 2
CINEMA rating: For viewers 18 years old and above

The Happening opens with workers at a construction site falling one after the other to their deaths. Elsewhere, in New York’s Central Park, the leaves stir in a lingering breeze that emits an eerie wailing sound; promenaders lose control of their movements and memory, stopping dead and walking backward on their tracks without knowing or remembering why. Then, apparently in a trance, they kill themselves. News of the weird happening reaches the classroom of Philadelphia high school teacher Elliot Moore (Mark Wahlberg). They are discussing the mysterious and sudden disappearance of millions of honey bees when the school administration calls a meeting to send the students home as the New York tragedy, feared to be another terrorist attack, seems to be creeping into Philadelphia. Elliot, his wife Alma (Zooey Deschanel), a friend and fellow teacher Julian (John Leguizamo), and Julian’s daughter Jess (Ashlyn Sanchez) flee to safer grounds on a train. Trouble brews as the train, brimming over with anxious passengers, stops at a deserted station where the train personnel admit they have lost contact with everyone.

Seeing “Directed by M Night Shayamalan” on the screen as the film opens makes the viewer expect a superior mystery thriller. After all, the director has made a name for himself crafting off-the-beaten-path stories of terror bearing a profound and relevant message: Signs, The Village, etc. The first ten minutes or so of The Happening delivers the chills, like a blast of cold air when you open a freezer, but beyond that it seems to thaw out. Sights and sounds are effective—the leaves fluttering ominously in the wind and wailing manifest the power of the unseen to terrify. The broken bodies on the ground, a hairpin stabbed into a woman’s jugular—such things have their shock value, but their impact is short-lived. Wahlberg is a great actor, but the character he’s portraying is too bland for his talents. As for the other actors—they simply do what their part asks for, which isn’t much.

Would you bother to see a mystery thriller that fails to mystify or thrill you most of the time? Then lower your expectations. Since The Happening is not supposed to be an ordinary “scary movie” but one that is hoped to stimulate and engage your intellect into pondering life’s deeper riddles, you would at least expect to learn something worthwhile out of it. Surely The Happening is trying to say something; it just didn’t seem to know how to say it—which leads you to conclude that it doesn’t know what it wants to say. When the movie says the mass suicides are induced by an invisible airborne “natural compound” (that once inhaled makes you want to savagely kill yourself), is it warning us against abusing our environment? Not clear. When after running for their lives the Moore couple (wanting to die together) expose themselves to the deadly wind and survive, is the movie saying “love conquers all”? Not sure. When the creative juices are running dry but the director wants to continue piggy-back riding on past success, what happens? The Happening turns out to be not much of a happening.

Kung-fu Panda

Title: Kung Fu Panda; Lead Cast: Jack Black, Dustin Hoffman, Angelina Jolie, Lucy Liu, Jacky Chan, Ian Mcshane; Director: Mark Osborne, John Stevenson; Story: Ethan Reiff, Cyrus Voris; Screenplay: Jonathan Aibel, Glenn Berger; Cinematography: Yong Duk Jhun; Editing: Clare De Chenu; Producer: Melissa Cobb; Music: John Powell, Hans Zimmer; Location: China; Genre: Animation Action-Comedy; Distributor: Dreamworks Animation; Running Time: 88 minutes;

Technical Assessment : 3.5
Moral Assessment : 3
Cinema Rating : For ages 13 and below with parental guidance

Po (Jack Black) is a sloppy, overweight but loveable Panda who dreams to be a kung-fu master one day. However, he seems to be stuck in a noodle shop run by his father, surprisingly a gentle goose, Mr. Ping (James Hong). He lives in a peaceful and loving village which is threatened when rumors circulate about the escape of the vicious snow leopard villain Tai Ling (Ian McShane). Kung-fu masters of the Jade Palace immediately announce the need to fulfill the ancient prophecy and select a Dragon Warrior. Naturally, the top five martial arts students vie for the title and set off to an elimination round. Po hero-worships the “Furious Five” composed of Tigress (Angelina Jolie), Crane (David Cross), Mantis (Seth Rogen), Viper (Lucy Liu) and Monkey (Jacky Chan) and wastes no time to witness the competition. By an extreme clumsiness and unfortunate luck, Po ends in the middle of the courtyard and is declared by aging Master Oogway to be the Dragon Warrior. Master Shifu (Dustin Hoffman) reluctantly takes on the task to train the supposed savior of their village but the battle Po must first win is with himself and his insecurities as well as the resentment of the five star students who have no respect for him at all.

Kung Fu Panda is undoubtedly predictable and an old formula for an action-comedy movie but it pulls it off successfully with ease and delight. The film is a visual feast with a barrage of vibrant color and amazingly detailed Chinese landscapes. The action sequences themselves are enjoyable with a brilliant choreography and impressive animation. The screenplay has the perfect amount and pace of humor, wisdom and story-telling that adults will find the movie interesting while kids will just be engrossed with the spectacle.

The movie conveys several lessons and values. One, Po discovers that to achieve success there is no secret ingredient or secret formula, just enough honesty and sincerity coupled with determination and passion. At the end, only one’s self will help one triumph. Two, Mr. Ping emphasizes that to make something special, you yourself have to believe it is special. Appreciation has to come first from within because the value of something is determined by the value one gives it. Three, the movie also talks about having and fulfilling a destiny. While some are born to have distinguished roles in the future, one still has to wholeheartedly accept the responsibility, strive to learn and master what is needed to be able to fulfill the task and have the passion and fortitude to see it through no matter how hard or painful. Some elements of the movie, particularly the action sequences, may be worrisome for parents. It is better to have a responsible adult accompany and guide very young audiences.

Sex and the City

Title: Sex and the City Cast: Sarah Jessica Parker, Nixon, Kristin Davis, Kim Cattral, Chris Noth, Jennifer Hudson Director: Michael Patrick King Producers: Eric M. Cyphers, Michael Patrick King, John P. Melfi, Sarah Jessica Parker, Darren Star Screenwriters: Michael Patrick King, Candice Bushnell Music: Aaron Zigma Editor: Michael Berenbaum Genre: Romantic Comedy Cinematography: John Thomas Distributor: Cinestar Location: New York, USA and Los Angeles, California Running Time: 150 min.

Technical Assessment: 3

Moral Assessment: 2.5

CINEMA Rating: For mature viewers 18 and above

Sex In the City (The Movie) takes off where the HBO series left five years ago. It begins with Carrie Bradshaw (Sarah Jessica Parker) giving a fast-paced rundown of her and her friends’ journey in searching and finding love. Five years hence, writer and shoe addict Carrie has been steadily dating her on and off boyfriend, Mr. Big John (Chris Noth) and is about to move in together to an upscale 5^th Avenue Penthouse. Flamboyant PR consultant Samantha Jones has moved to LA to manage her boyfriend Smith’s Hollywood career. Classic Charlotte (Kristin Davis) has adopted a Chinese girl and is living her fairytale marriage with lawyer husband, Harry. And no-nonsense lawyer Miranda (Cynthia Nixon) has moved to the suburbs with her plain Joe husband Steve and son Brady. Despite their career and personal preoccupations as well as the distance between their homes, the girls always find time to get together as they have done for the past 20 years. This time, they attend an auction of a famous girl’s prized pieces of jewelry after she has been thrown out of the house by her billionaire boyfriend--a predicament which Carrie fears and later on voices out to John. They agree that getting married will make their arrangement more secure; soon after, wedding plans are drawn. But the wedding gets cancelled --how ar ethe women going to take the situation?

Fans of the original HBO series will find the movie take a little too overstretched and slow-paced at times. There are several extended scenes which only prolong the movie. The storytelling is a little scattered and the plot a bit loose compared to the tight 30-minuters of the series. However, one will still recognize the familiar elements of the show: the high and colorful fashion, the witty retorts and funny quips and the strong characterizations not just of the four girls but of their respective partners and supporting casts as well. The theme is timeless and universal so that even though the protagonists are 40-something women, audience will still rage, cry, laugh and root for their happy endings. The scoring, though a little corny, still delivers the emotion of the scene. Production design is stupendous and classy especially with Patricia Fields’ couture that not only spells style and creativity but also deepens the characterization as well. Editing and camera works are proficient. Unfortunately, in the effort to lower the ratings to accommodate the younger audience and be able to screen in more cinemas, the splicing of scenes is at times too abrupt and distracting.

What about the message of the movie? First, the positive side: For the movie version, the girls are tamer and more mature in dealing with relationships. They have learned the values of fidelity, commitment and sacrifice. Each story tries to convey a value of relationship and love. Miranda’s story talks how marriage should not be a reason to try hard in sustaining the romance. Samantha shows that at times, one needs to take care of the self before she can take care of others. Charlotte’s story demonstrates how one needs to trust that good things will happen despite the odds. And Carrie’s tale reminds us that weddings are not about the fancy details and elaborate arrangements but about two people in love and willing to spend the rest of their lives together. You get married for the right reasons (even in an “unlabeled” gown) and stay married despite the difficulties and inconveniences. One will also admire the bond of the girls’ friendship and how they are all supportive and forgiving of one another.

Now for the not so positive side: as always, the dialogues and scenes are laden with “sex”, although the lovemaking scenes are tamer and monogamous. Audiences with our culture will be uncomfortable with the “live-in” arrangements of Carrie and Samantha and with the suggestion that marriage is unnecessary when the relationship is going well. Some people may also find sexual humors offensive and crude. Over-all the movie is definitely more subdued but still, it definitely caters to older and more sophisticated, mature viewers.

Caregiver

Title: Caregiver Cast: Sharon Cuneta, John Estrada, John Manalo, Makisig Morales, Boots Anson-Roa, Jhong Hilario, Rica Peralejo, Mickey Ferriols, Lotlot de Leon, Monique Wilson, Anita Linda Director: Chito Roño Producer: Star Cinema Screenwriter: Chris Martinez Genre: Drama Distributor: Star Cinema Location: London, England Running Time: 110 min.

Technical Assessment: 3.5

Moral Assessment: 3

CINEMA Rating: For viewers age 13 and below with parental guidance

Tinalikuran ni Sarah (Sharon Cuneta) ang pagiging guro upang makasunod sa asawang si Teddy (John Estrada) sa London at maging caregiver doon. Iniwan ni Sarah sa Pilipinas ang anak na si Paulo (John Manalo) nang mabigat ang loob. Pagdating sa London ay pagsusumikapan nilang mag-asawa na maka-ipon upang agad makuha si Paulo at mamumuhay sila bilang isang pamilya sa London. Ngunit hindi ito agad mangyayari dahil sa sanga-sangang problemang haharapin ni Sarah kapiling si Teddy. Unti-unti ring mamumulat si Sarah sa napakaraming realidad ng buhay sa London. Ang hirap ng trabaho bilang caregiver at ang asawang nakalugmok sa mga bigong pangako at wasak na pangarap.

Bagama’t hindi maikakailang formula at de-kahon ang Caregiver, nakapagbigay pa rin ito ng bagong pananaw ukol sa kalagayan ng mga kababayan nating Overseas Filipino Worker (OFW) sa London. Bago ang konseptong caregiving at hindi pa ito masyadong natatalakay sa pelikula man o telebisyon. Naging matapang ang pelikula sa hamong ipakita ang isang aspeto ng pagiging OFW na hindi pa masyadong talamak sa pag-iisip ng mga manonood. Mahusay ang pagkakaganap ng mga tauhan mula sa mga bidang sina Sharon Cuneta, John Estrada, John Manalo hanggang sa mga artistang may maliit lamang na papel tulad ni Anita Linda. Natural ang mga linya at tamang-tama ang timpla ng mga eksena. Hindi man ganoon kabigat ang dating sa mga manonood, hindi pa rin maitatangging nadala ng Caregiver ang mga manonood sa isang lugar at buhay na malayo sa ating ulirat.

Ipinakikita ng Caregiver ang napakaraming sakripisyong pinagdaraanan ang mga nakikipagsapalaran sa ibang bansa kapalit ng pangakong higit na magandang buhay. Hindi nga lahat ng umaalis at nangingibang-bayan ay nagiging matagumpay. Hindi lahat ng pangarap ay natutupad at nasasagot ng paga-abroad. Sa katunayan, karamihan sa mga tunay na problema ay hindi nag-uugat sa pera kundi sa kaibuturan ng pagkatao na nananatili saan mang lugar mapunta, kumita man ng malaking halaga. Kapuri-puri ang katauhan ni Sarah na naging matapang sa gitna ng maraming pagsubok. Naging masunurin sa asawa si Sarah hanggang sa mamulat sa katotohanang may sarili siyang pag-iisip na dapat ding igalang. Isa rin siyang mapagmahal na ina na pinagsusumikapang ipaliwanag at ipadama sa anak ang kahalagahan ng pagtitiis at pagtupad sa pangako. Hindi rin matatawaran ang pagbibigay ng pelikula ng dignidad sa isang trabahong madalas ay minamaliit at pinandidirihan: ang pagiging caregiver. Gaano man kaliit o kababa ang isang hanapbuhay, nagiging mataas ito at kapuri-puri kapag binigyang dignidad at halaga mismo ng mga taong nasa trabahong ito. Ang taong nagmamalasakit sa trabaho ay nagmamalasakit sa kapwa. Nakakabahala lamang ang mensahe ng pelikulang walang asenso sa Pilipinas kung kaya’t mas pinipili ng mga Pilipinong magpakababa sa ibang bayan upang guminhawa lamang sa buhay. Bagama’t may bahid ito ng katotohanan, hindi ito ang ganap na katotohanan, at dapat pa ring malaman, unawain at maramdaman ng mga kabataan na ang sariling bayan ang siyang dapat unang paglingkuran.

21

Title: 21

Cast: Tim Sturgess, Kevin Spacey, Kate Bosworth, Laurence Fishbourne, Aaron Yoo, Liza Lapira, Jacob Pitts, Jack McGee, Josh Gad, Sam Golzari, Helen Carey, Jack Gilpin, Donna Lows, Butch Williams Director: Robert Luketic Producers: Dana Brunette, Kevin Spacey Screenwriters: Peter Steinfeld, Alan Loeb Music: James Newton Howard Editor: Elliot Graham Genre: Comedy Cinematography: Russel Carpenter Distributor: Columbia Pictures; Sony Pictures Releasing International Location: Boston, Las Vegas, USA Running Time: 95 min.

Technical Assessment: 3.5

Moral Assessment: 2.5

CINEMA Rating: For viewers 14 and above

Ben Campbell (Jim Sturgess) is in his last year at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He now has set his mind to become a doctor and applied for enrollment at the Harvard Medical School. His problem is to find the means to come up with his tuition fees of $300,000. He works hard at his job and looks for other opportunities. But this is a slow and hard way to save. Besides he has his classes, school projects and study to attend to. Out of the blue he is invited by his math professor Micky Rosa (Kevin Spacey) to join his secret small group of students who visit Las Vegas on weekends to play Black Jack, an easy game to play and to win a lot of money in the casinos without fail. Mickey knows that Ben is the smartest in his math class and a genius above his team of players. At first he refuses the invitation. But when the professor sends group member Jill (Kate Bosworth) to convince him “how his life could change for the better”, Ben finally gives in. He is taught their means of communication: a way of counting cards on the table, the use of signs, signals, body movements, and so on. Once ready and prepared, Micky leads Ben and the team to hit Las Vegas.

21 is an unusual story because it presents a professor of mathematics who recruits his best math students and trains them to play cards to win. The story is exciting to watch. There are comic moments to laugh at, although more appealing for the viewers would be the scenes around the gaming tables, waiting to see what is going to happen, how would the game end up? This includes trying to interpret the meaning of every signal being sent by a teammate to another without giving themselves away. They have been trained not to recognize or acknowledge each other within the casino limits. The small ensemble cast work very well together. Outstanding, among them, as expected are veteran actor Kevin Spacey and newcomer Jim Sturgess. As a story, there are moments when a scene or sequence does not seem connected to another, like an abrupt ending, or how is the game played, what is involved.

What happens when the best students are trained and taught to use their brains to take advantage of others? Because of their concentration on the game, and winnings, the bright math students neglect their studies, for one. The develop a liking for what they're doing. Their values change. In particular, Ben who said to Jill that he would quit the game the moment he had the cash needed for his tuition, did not want to quit anymore. He has changed from a shy simple young man to someone who now loved the con man he has become. He lies to his mother about getting a scholarship, neglects his girlfriend, and messes things up with his two project buddies.

Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull

Title: Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull Cast: Harrison Ford, Cate Blanchett, Karen Allen, Shia LeBeouf, Ray Winstone, John Hurt, Jim Broadbent. Genre: Action-adventure. Director: Steven Spielberg. Writers: David Koepp, George Lucas. Distributor: Paramount Pictures. Location: Peru. Running time: 124 minutes.

Technical: 3.5
Moral: 3
CINEMA rating: PG 13

Years ago, Indiana Jones (Harrison Ford) is supposed to have seen in a humongous warehouse a crate that contains hyper-magnetic material. Now the Soviet femme fatale Irina Spalko (Cate Blanchett) who is as beautiful as she is heartless, takes Indy and his sidekick Mac McHale (Ray Winstone) to this warehouse to find this crate. The mysterious crate leads the trio and Irina’s coterie of equally vicious Russians to the Amazonian wilderness, picking up along the way Indy’s “support group” Marion Ravenwood (Karen Allen), motorcycle buff Mutt Williams (Shia LeBeouf), and aging Professor Oxley (John Hurt) who is most useful in deciphering cave drawings, explaining things nobody knows about, and carrying the crystal skull they have found in a crypt. The crystal skull is supposed to be one of the 13—the other 12 are concealed in an ancient subterranean city of gold beneath a pyramid in Peru—and supposedly represents one-thirteenth of all knowledge that is knowable by man. Like all other power-charged antiquities, the crystal skull must be returned to its original home, otherwise…

Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull is the fourth IJ adventure…, and while it may not surpass or even equal Raiders of the Lost Ark (the first of the Indiana Jones series, 1981), it’s hard to say if Crystal Skull couldn’t be the best had it been the first Indiana Jones movie. That usually happens with cinematic greats that have Numbers 2, 3, 4 or more following them, like Rambo, Lord of the Rings, Harry Potter, etc.—the public normally judges the first as the best, then the interest wanes. When the novelty fades, Number 2, 3, etc. have to try twice as hard to keep viewers high. Viewers want more of the same, the excitement of the first. But what human reaction to pleasure doesn’t reflect the same addictive pattern? The first almost always sets the standards for sequels, but producers can’t seem to sustain the level of creativity because their chief motivation now is to cash in on the financial success of the original.

Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull is no exception, but it has its share of action and inaction, so to speak. First, the lack of action: Indiana Jones is synonymous with action-adventure, thus, expect viewers to be impatient—if they don’t doze off, that is—with the dialogue earlier on in the movie. We suspect, however, that the footage devoted to talking heads is their way of shortening running time—instead of acting out the background, they make the characters tell the story.

Now the action: wow, it can only happen in the movies! The vine-swinging would shame Tarzan. The race on the edge of the cliff will keep you on the edge of your seat. It’s assuring to know senior citizens (Ford and Hurt) can see that much fantabulous action without as much as dislocating a kneecap. It’s amazing to see a fragile-looking Russian lady can fence, shoot, fight, leap, kick and drive like an ex-Le Mans racer and still keep her bangs impeccably intact. It’s comforting to believe your puny boat can plunge down three gigantic waterfalls in three minutes and still run with all passengers cool and collected in their seats—are they wearing seatbelts? But of course, action-adventure flicks especially in the era of CGI must defy logic and break the laws of physics—otherwise they wouldn’t be credible as such. So, enjoy the engineering marvel that is the underground kingdom—and the cliffs and the waterfalls, creations that fill you with awe.

On its first screening day, Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull was the only movie showing at all Power Plant cinemas; still it was full house, with a number of shrieking kids among the audience. We wonder if this was true of all theaters showing it; if so, Indiana Jones can give Spiderman a run for his money. (Spiderman is Number One among Filipino audiences’ all-time favorites). MTRCB has given a “GP” (General Patronage) rating to the movie, and CINEMA agrees it’s entertaining and wholesome enough; however, due to certain images and incidents that could frighten young children, CINEMA rates it as PG 13, meaning even children below 13 may watch but with parental guidance. The movie requires a certain degree of sophistication to be fully appreciated, so it’s up to the parents or accompanying elders to simplify the background and the details for the children, and to explain culture-related issues so as not to engender biases and prejudice in young minds. (Example: The Russians are bad guys.)

Forbidden Kingdom

Title: Forbidden Kingdom Cast: Jacky Chan, Jet Li, Michael Angarano, Liu Yifei, Collin Chou Director: Rob Minkoff Producer: Casey Silver Screenwriter: John Fusco Music: David Buckley Editor: Eric Strand Genre: Fantasy Action Cinematography: Peter Pau Distributor: Viva International Pictures Location: Ancient China Running Time: 153 min.

Technical Assessment: 4
Moral Assessment: 3
CINEMA Rating: For viewers age 13 and below with parental guidance

Jason (Micheal Angarano) is a young timid boy from Boston who loves Martial Arts. He frequents Old Hop’s (Jacky Chan) pawnshop/video store in the Chinatown area to rent kung-fu movies. On one of his trips, a group of bullies manhandle him and force him to lead them to the Old Hop’s store for them to rob. In the mayhem, Old Hop gets shot and turns over a mysterious staff to Jason for him to “return to its rightful owner”. Jason runs for his life and falls off the roof just to wake up transported back in time to ancient China where the supernatural Jade Warlord (Collin Chou) rules with oppression. Jason learns that he is the “seeker” and reluctantly fulfills the ancient prophesy to find the Monkey King (Jet Li) and return his staff. Unfortunately for him, he has to deal with the Jade Warlord and his formidable army. He is aided and tutored by a wine-loving poet and comical fighter Lu Yan (Jackie Chan) and the pensive Silent Monk (Jet Li). They are also joined by the exquisite orphaned Golden Sparrow (Liu Yufei) who vows revenge for her parents’ death and kills her enemies with hairpins. Together, they must free the Monkey King so he can fight the Jade Warlord and return peace to the empire.

The movie is delightful to watch with its breathtaking scenery, creative sets and costume design, graceful and impressive martial arts sequences and a few funny quips every now and then. The plot seems to be a
combination of borrowed themes from other Hollywood fantasy movies and Ancient Chinese legend but with a competent direction and straightforward storytelling, audience can follow the story effortlessly. Although Chan and Li play supporting roles to American teenager Angarano, there are still enough fight sequences and comic moments where the two martial art legends are pitted against each other. Overall the movie may not be memorable compared to other Chinese epics but is enchanting enough for the audience to want to watch it again.

The movie talks about friendship, perseverance and unity. At first the main characters have a low regard for each other but eventually learn to appreciate, respect and care for one another all in the effort to accomplish a common goal. It shows also how people, once consumed with the moral obligation and desire to do what is right can be willing to risk and sacrifice himself. The movie also makes a stand against revenge and hate. There are several words of wisdom offered by Chan’s character which will be remembered and can be used for one’s daily life choices. Although the movie is light and seemingly harmless, the charmingly choreographed fight scenes are violent although bloodless. There are a few cuss words and sexual reference although not portrayed explicitly. Substance abuse is apparent with Chan’s character. Viewers below 13 should be guided by mature adults.