Cast: Nicolas Cage, Shahkrit Yamnarm, Charlie Yeung, Panward Hemmanee; Directors: Oxide Pang Chun, Danny Pang; Producers: Nicolas Cage, Norman Golightly, William Sherak, Jason Shuman; Screenwriters: Jason Richman, Oxide Pang Chun; Music: Brian Tyler; Editors: Mike Jackson, Curran Pang; Genre: Action; Cinematography: Decha Srimantra; Distributor: Lionsgate; Location: Bangkok, Thailand; Running Time: 100 min.;Technical Assessment: 3
Moral Assessment: 2.5
CINEMA Rating: For viewers 14 and above
Joe (Nicolas Cage), an assassin, goes to Bangkok on an assignment to kill four people. He hires pickpocket Kong (Shahkrit Yamnam) as his assistant and messenger. Joe receives the contract from a Bangkok gangster, as to who will be Joe’s specific target, through Kong and a dancer who later on becomes romantically involved with Kong. Joe breaks his own rule of not getting involved with people on his missions where he takes Kong as his “student” because he sees him as a younger version of himself. Joe also meets and falls for a beautiful deaf-mute pharmacist (Charlie Yeung). After Joe has successfully done his three assignments of killing “bad people” or “bad for somebody” as he says, the fourth one seems to be crucial and difficult because Kong has told him that the said target is a good man. As Joe’s days pass by in Bangkok, he starts to grow a conscience which makes it difficult for him to carry on his line of work.
There’s nothing really big nor spectacular in Bangkok Dangerous except for the expected performance of Nicolas Cage which fans would surely appreciate. However, non-fans would be disappointed with Cage’s haggard look even in supposedly romantic scenes. There is no chemistry among love partners in the movie. One does not see any romantic link whatsoever between any of the characters. Cage and Yamnam are able to connect as student-mentor but the shallow and hollow script does not provide further depth to their characters endear them to the audience. The plot is quite cheesy and mushy to the point of being predictable and soap operatic. There is an attempt to make this movie an exceptional action picture but still the film fails in so many ways to excite the audience and to fulfill expectations.
Joe’s character, as the movie says, is an amoral character because he only assassinates and kills “bad for somebody” people. However, he also kills any link that would lead to him as a suspect including his hired assistants or messengers. Either way, killing is immoral and there is no way one can justify it as amoral. Putting Bangkok Dangerous into context, the film tries to explore the dark world of crime, sex, drugs and violence in a place that is considered to be the “sex capital” of the world so it is inevitable to include scenes with a degree of sex, violence, substance use and abuse. Joe’s character has been doomed and redemption is uncertain. Kong’s willingness to be trained in the dark world is also quite objectionable as this may be deemed as right by the very young audiences and this somehow gives a bad light to the concept of mentoring. There are also scenes of gore that leaves a desensitizing effect on the audience’s tolerance of violence. There is cursing, fighting, lewd dancing, alcohol drinking, so young viewers should be guided.
