Ang Tanging Ina Nyong Lahat

Cast: Ai-Ai Delas Alas, Eugene Domingo, Carlo Aquino, Cherry Pie Picache, Shaina Magdayao, Jiro Manio, Alwyn Uytingco, Gloria Diaz; Director: Wenn Deramas; Screenplay: Mel Mendoza-del Rosario; Distributor: Star Cinema; Genre: Comedy; Location: Philippines; Running Time: 110 mins;

Technical Assessment: 3.5
Moral Assessment: 3
Rating: For viewers 14 years old and above

Makalipas ang mahigit 30 taon ng pagiging ulirang ina sa isang dosenang anak, makakaramdam si Ina (Ai-Ai Delas Alas) ng pagkabalisa at hahanapin niyang muli ang kanyang sarili at kung paano muli siyang maipagmamalaki ng kanyang mga anak.. Susubukan niyang magbalik-eskuwela habang nagtatrabaho, ngunit hindi pa rin ito magiging sapat. Magbabago ang takbo ng kanyang buhay nang mamasukan siya sa Malacanan bilang chamber maid. Mapapalapit siya sa pangulo ng Pilipinas (Gloria Diaz) at isang hindi inaasahang pagkakataon ay mauulinigan niya ang isang masamang balak na pagpaslang dito. Hindi niya mapipigilan ang pagpapaslang sa pangulo ngunit magiging susi siya upang malutas ang kaso. Dahil dito ay hahamunin siya ng mga kalaban na tumakbo sa pagka-Pangulo ng bansa. Matapos ang masusing pag-iisip ay tatanggapin niya ito ay siya ay mananalo. Kayanin kaya ni Ina ang pagiging ina ng buong bayan habang ginagampanan ang pagiging tunay na ina sa mga anak?

Isang mahusay na komedya ang pelikula. Tulad sa inaasahan, hitik sa katatawanan ang buong kuwento na bagama’t hindi lohikal ay nagawang papaniwalain ang mga manonood na ito ay posible. Tama ang timpla ng komedya at drama na talaga namang malaman din ang mga mensahe. Kahanga-hanga ang lahat ng tauhan lalo na ang actor na si Eugene Domingo na hindi matatawaran ang galing sa pagpapatawa. Si Domingo ang halos nagdala ng aliw sa pelikula mula simula hanggang wakas. Mas mahusay naman sa pagda-drama si Delas Alas kaysa sa pagpapatawa. Ngunit kung susumahin ay epektibo rin naman siya. Napanindigan nang husto ng Ang Tanging Ina Niyong Lahat ang pagpapatawa na hindi lumaylay at laging may mga bagong patawa at pasabog bawat eksena.

Hanggang saan nga ba nasusukat ang kadakilaan ng isang ina? Nariyang pasukin ang lahat ng trabaho, maitaguyod lamang ang mga anak tulad ng karakter ni Ina sa pelikula. Pero kadalasa’y hindi pa rin ito nagiging sapat. Marahil, sadyang walang hangganan ang sukatan ng pagiging ulirang ina. Ipinakikita sa pelikula ang lahat ng maaaring gawin ng isang ina para sa kanyang anak. Sinasabi ring iba talaga ang pagmamahal ng isang ina at maaari itong maging lakas ng sinumang nagnanais ng magpatakbo ng isang bayan. Sa pelikula’y naging labis na suwail ang mga anak ni Ina ngunit nagsisi naman ang mga ito sa bandang huli. Bagay na kapupulutan ng aral ng mga manonood. May ilang mga eksena lamang na patungkol sa sekswalidad at ilang maselang isyu na maaaring hindi angkop sa mga batang manonood.

Iskul Bukol; 20 Years After

Cast: Tito Sotto, Vic Sotto, Joey de Leon, Oyo Sotto, Gian Sotto, Keempee de Leon, Benjie Paras, Jose; Director: Tony Reyes ; Screenplay: Bibeth Orteza;: Northern Philippines; Genre: Comedy; Distributor: Octo-Arts, Mzet Film

Technical Assessment: 2
Moral Assessment: 2.5
Cinema Rating : For viewers age 13 and below with parental guidance

Makalipas ang 20 taon, si Vic Ungasis (Sotto) ay isa nang sikat at matagumpay na archeologist. Pilit niyang tinutuklas ang isang gamit ni Humabon at ang kampilan ni Lapu-Lapu upang maibigay sa museo. Samantala, isang Hapon naman ang makamit ang serbisyo ng kapwa archeologist at kaibigan ni Vic (Benjie Paras) upang makuha ang peseta na nakakabit sa kampilan ni Lapu-Lapu. Sinasabing ang sinumang may hawak ng peseta ay magkakaroon ng panangga sa kamatayan. Sa kabilang dako, masasangkot ang magkapatid na Tito (Sotto) at Joey (de Leon) Escalera dahil sa kanilang katusuhan at pagbebenta ng pekeng peseta sa mga Hapon. Sa kwentong ito nakapaloob ang pagplaplano ng isang class reunion ni Miss Tapia upang magkasama-sama ang mga dating tauhan ng sikat na palabas noong dekada 70 hanggang 80.

Katulad nang malimit gawin sa industriya ng pelikulang Pilipino, ginamit lamang ang pagka-sikat ng Iskul Bukol bilang panghatak sa mga manunuod. Walang kinalaman ang pamagat sa daloy ng kwento; bagkus ginawa lamang itong dahilan upang ilabas ang mga dating tauhan mula kina Miss Tapia (Mely Tagasa) hanggang kina Richie d’ Horsey. Napakababaw ng komedya ng palabas na nakasalalay lamang sa slapstick at patawang seksuwal. Ang pelikula ay hindi pinauusad ng istorya kundi ng mga tagpi-tagping eksena lamang na kung minsan ay wala namang koneksyon sa isa’t isa o hindi naman kailangan ng kuwento. Tuloy, naging mabagal ang pagusad ng pelikula at tila napakahaba ang paghihintay na matapos na ito. Maging ang mga CGI’s at special effects ay hindi pulido at halatang-halatang peke.

Mabuti laban sa masama … at ang mabuti ang nagwagi. Ito marahil ang tanging magandang aral ng pelikula. Ang kabutihang loob ni Ungasis ang nagtagumpay laban sa ganid ng mga Hapon, sa traydor na kaibigan at mapagsamantalang mga kasama. Bilang isang komedya, nakalulungkot isipin na sa kabila ng makabagong teknolohiya, malikhain at mahuhusay na manunulat at malaking salaping ipinupuhunan, madalas mababang uri pa rin ang kinalalabasan ng ating mga pelikula dahil kulang sa pagsusumikap na iahon mula sa slapstick, toilet humor at sex jokes ang pagpapatawa, puliduhin ang produksyon at laliman ang pagbuo sa mga tauhan. Bagamat hindi ganoong kalaswa at violent ang palabas, hindi rin naman kaiga-igaya ang ilang eksena at pag-uusap para sa mga kabataan. Bagkus, maaaring akalain pang tama at gayahin pa ang ilang pag-uugali at pagsasalita dahil hindi naman masasabing ganap na “objectionable” ito.

Quarantine

Cast: Jennifer Carpenter, Steve Harris, Jay Hernandez, Johnathon Schaech ; Director: John Erick Dowdle; Screenplay: John Erick Dowdle, Drew Dowdle; Producer: Julio Fernández, Roy Lee, Carlos Fernández, Sergio Aguero, Clint Culpepper, Doug Davison ; Genre: Horror; Location:US; Running Time: 89 mins

Technical Assessment: 3
Moral Assessment: 2.5
Cinema Rating: For mature viewers 18 and above

Television reporter Angela Vidal (Jennifer Carpenter) and her camareman (Steve Harris) are assigned to do a story about Los Angeles firefighters. As they are doing a video documentary, they are to spend one night shift with the firemen on duty covering all aspects of their job which include paramedics and responding to almost any kind of emergency. On that night, the fire company receives a call for an emergency at an apartment building. Angela and her cameraman follow the firemen routine. When they get there, they end up as witness to a horrifying disease that has infected most of the apartment building's residents. To their surprise, the entire building will be put on quarantine upon the order of the local government. They will all be trapped inside and as they find their way out, they discover an even more shocking truth: the infected people have gone totally insane and they attack and kill the living.

A remake of the Spanish thriller [REC] as in record, Quarantine is fresh shocker that tells the entire story on the point-of-view of an actual viewfinder of a camera from start to finish. This idea is not entirely new for those who have seen The Blair Witch Project which uses the same approach. The shaky camera shot and seem inadequate lighting are all part of the film's style. This has made the audience believe they really are watching an actual documentary of a real event making the shock and thrill seem very real. The actors are effective and Carpenter is convincing as the reporter documenting an actual horror experience. But then, at the end of the movie, the audience are left with nothing to ponder on because the entire film lacks depth and it does not go beyond its shocking value.

How far should a news reporter go to cover an interesting story? Is it moral to sacrifice innocent lives for the sake of preventing the spread of a pandemic? These are some of the questions worth asking while watching the film. The mass media itself loves sensationalized stories and the darker and riskier the story is, the more premium for the reporter. With this kind of mindset, the mass media persons end up to be go getters of any opportunity to which they sometimes end up as sacrificial lambs. This is the fate of Angela in the movie. But then, her character exemplifies loyalty to one's job and this can be a good point. However, limits should be set so as not to jeopardize their lives in the line of duty. The audience's hearts go for the innocent victims of government's recklessness in implementing measures of preventing a pandemic from spreading. This is left for a much wider debate on bio-terrorism and quarantines. However, the right to life of a person, especially the innocent, should always be an utmost consideration. The gore, violence and emotional stress in the movie may cause nightmares and trauma for very young audiences so CINEMA deems the movie fit for mature viewers only.

The Day The Earth Stood Still

Cast: Keannu Reeves, Jennifer Connelly, Kathy Bates, Jaden Smith, John Cleese; Director: Scott Derickson; Producers: Paul Harris Boardman, Gregory Goodman, Erwin Stoff; Screenwriter: David Scarpa; Music: Tyler Bates; Editor: Wayne Wahrman; Genre: Drama/ Sci-Fi/ Thriller; Cinematography: David Tattersall; Distributor: Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation; Location: British Columbia, Canada; Running Time: 103 min.;

Technical Assessment: 3.5
Moral Assessment: 3
CINEMA Rating: For viewers 14 and above

A pulsating, glowing sphere lands in Central Park in New York City. The government summons a pool of experts to advise on the situation, led by Harvard scientist Helen Benson (Jennifer Connelly). Soon a luminous humanoid figure emerges from the sphere, Benson boldly moves forward to establish contact with it, but the creature is felled by a bullet—fired by the government’s forces under the command of US President’s spokesperson, Regina Jackson (Kathy Bates). This ignites the fury, it seems, of whoever or whatever else is inside the sphere, and it sends out a giant robot whose mere size renders the government soldiers paranoid. The soldiers open fire but the robot is impregnable—besides, its slit “eyes” and shoot forth enough fire power to annihilate the entire US Army. Stunned, the soldiers scamper away to safety while Jackson, much to Benson’s dismay, abducts the wounded alien to an undercover medical facility. The dogged presidential spokesperson is intent on keeping it alive in order to find out what the aliens want from Earthlings. This is where they learn that the humanoid creature is called Klaatu (Keanu Reeves), and the quick-thinking Benson virtually helps free him from Jackson’s clutches.

The Day the Earth Stood Still is a remake of the 1951 Robert Wise sci-fi classic but it would not be fair to compare the two as the technological milieu that spawned them differs from one age to the other. The current version is understandably high-rating on the CGI, featuring stunning features to drive the movie’s message home—a message that would easily be caught by a younger audience precisely because of the visual impact it could create on the viewer. With his calm facial features, Reeves is perfectly cast as the dispassionate creature from outer space—after all, he’s not really a warm-blooded person but a mechanism wrapped in blubber and packaged in a human body. In appearance, Connelly is the antithesis of the scientist—in case you’re expecting an Einstein clone—but is still effective especially in emoting as any human is wont to do under the circumstances. Bates, who’s supposed to speak for the US President (who never appears on screen), has the right amount of pluck to provide tension to the action.

The Day the Earth Stood Still is basically about how human beings, inhabitants of Planet Earth, react to otherworldly presence. The film may or may not have meant it but it seems to be a statement against human’s—and particularly the American military elements—paranoid yet condescending attitude towards non-humans. Here the non-human apparently aims for a dialogue, but only one scientist has the guts or the faith to respond and welcome its intention. The armed forces, feeling smug about their military might, haul out their most sophisticated artillery and decimate whatever goodwill the alien visit hoped to convey. But the non-humans prove superior, thereby only proving their presence on Earth necessary. Their message is, with the way we humans are abusing our planet, we’d kill it in due time, and since there are very few planets in the universe that can sustain life as Earth does, the aliens feel it their responsibility to annihilate the race of planet-killers—us earthlings. The movie could provide an interesting launching pad for family discussions. Let children put themselves in the shoes of the lead characters—Klaatu, Benson, Bates—and ask them what they would do under the same circumstances.

100

Cast: Mylene Dizon, Eugene Domingo, Tessie Tomas, TJ Trinidad, Cecille Paz, Ryan Eigenmann; Director: Chris Martinez; Producers: Chris Martinez, Marlon Rivera; Screenwriter: Chris Martinez; Music: Ricci Chan, Brian Cua; Editor: Ike Veneracion; Genre: Drama; Cinematography: Declan Quinn; Distributor: Cinemalaya; Location: Philippines; Running Time: 120 min.;

Technical Assessment: 4
Moral Assessment: 2.5
CINEMA Rating: For mature viewers 18 and above

Sa gitna ng maningning at matagumpay na karera, malalaman ni Joyce (Mylene Dizon) na siya ay may cancer at may tatlong buwang taning na lang ang buhay. Itatago niya muna ito sa ina (Tessie Tomas) at matalik na kaibigan na si Ruby (Eugene Domingo). Ngunit sa halip na magpadala sa takot at lungkot, gumawa si Joyce ng listahan ng isang daang bagay na nais niyang gawin bago siya mamatay. Karamihan sa mga ito ay patungkol sa mga relasyong hindi mabitiwan at mga sugat na hindi pa naghihilom. Mayroon ding mga mabababaw at malalalim ang kahulugan katulad ng pagpunta sa mga lugar na hindi pa napupuntahan, pagbabalik sa mga lugar na nagbibigay ng mga alaala, paggawa ng mabuti sa kapwa, paghalik sa hindi kilala, pagtulog buong araw, panonood ng sine buong araw, at marami pang iba. Sa pagharap niya at paggawa ng lahat ng ito, kasama niya si Ruby at ang kanyang ina bagama’t hindi lubos na tanggap nito ang kalagayan ng anak. Matupad kaya ni Joyce ang lahat ng isang-daang mga bagay na nais niyang gawin bago siya tuluyang pumanaw?

Mahusay ang pagkakagawa ng 100. May kurot sa puso at may tamang timpla ng drama at komedya. Walang itulak kabigin sa galing si Dizon at Domingo pati na ang iba nilang kasama sa pelikula. Isang bagong pagtingin ang pelikula sa buhay at kamatayan. Maayos ang daloy ng mga eksena at buong-buo ang tema kahit na may ilang eksenang kinunan lamang ng home video camera. Magaganda rin ang mga lugar na ginamit at damang-dama ng manonood na totoong tao ang kanilang pinapanood. Pawang isang pagsilip sa isang mundong moderno, maunlad, pero hindi pa rin nakakatakas sa mga realidad ng buhay tulad ng kamatayan, kabiguan at tagumpay.

Dapat nga ba nating katakutan ang kamatayan? Sa 100, hindi kinatakutan ni Joyce ang kamatayan, bagkus ay hinarap niya ito at tinanggap ng may ngiti sa labi at maluwag ang dibdib. Bagay na bihira nating masasaksihan sa sinuman. Ipinakita ng pelikula na dapat pa ring manalig at dumulog sa Diyos sa gitna ng paghihirap. Yun nga lang, may mga mangilan-ngilang eksenang pawang ginagawang katatawanan ang pananampalataya sa Diyos at ang pagiging dalisay ng kalooban. Para bang ang mga ito ay napaglipasan na at mga “baduy” kung ituring. Nariyan rin ang pakikiapid sa may asawa na halos kunsintihin ng pelikula bagama't binawi rin naman sa bandang huli. May ilang eksena rin kung saan ang mga tauhan ay nagpakita ng hubad na katawan. Bagama’t malinaw ang konteksto, maaring hindi pa rin ito maging akma sa batang manonood. Nanatili namang wagas ang pagkatao ng ibang tauhan tulad ng pari na hindi nagpadala sa tukso.

Four Christmases

Cast: Vince Vaughn, Reese Witherspoon, Robert Duvall, Sissy Spacek; Director: Seth Gordon; Producers: Jonathan Glickman, Vince Vaughn, Reese Witherspoon; Screenwriters: Matt Allen, Caleb Wilson; Music: Alex Wurman; Editors: Mark Helfrich, Melissa Kent; Genre: Comedy; Cinematography: Jeffrey l. Kimball; Distributor: New Line Cinema; Location: Los Angeles, California; Running Time: 82 min.;

Technical Assessment: 3
Moral Assessment: 3
CINEMA Rating: For viewers 14 and above

Brad (Vince Vaughn) and Kate (Reese Witherspoon) are a live-in couple who believe only marriage could ruin their relationship. They think they love each other despite the familiarity of having shared a bathroom for the past three years. They don’t want children, either. And during Christmas, when they are sure to get invitations from their four divorced parents, they hie off to some exotic location for their own secret holiday, all the while spinning lies and excuses. This time they say they are going to help as volunteers in Third World slums; truth is, they’re flying to Fiji. But heavy fog envelops San Francisco, grounding their flight, decimating their escapade, and putting the frustrated travelers on nationwide TV news. When their parents see them on TV, Brad and Kate are compelled to spend Christmas visiting their dysfunctional families—first his, and then hers. The Christmas day turns out to be Revelation Day when the couple discover from each other’s families about past secrets It also proves crucial for Kate who, despite the day’s awful experiences, gets to have some deep thinking that leads to her wanting to have her own family with Brad, but this horrifies Brad. So what now?

Four Christmases is supposed to be “serious comedy” where the heavy message is wrapped in tinsel, glitter-strewn, and beribboned in satin to catch the eye of the viewer. For laughs, a lot of sight gags and predictable slapstick are used, along with toilet humor, babies vomiting and defecating, life-threatening rough-housing between grown-up brothers, someone falling off a roof, sadistic kids ganging up on an adult as it if mugging were child’s play, etc. The situations also spawn crude language as a huge chunk of the script deals uninhibitedly on breastfeeding, libidinal activity in women past reproductive age, a younger man sleeping with his best friend’s mother, etc.

If there is one worthy message in Four Christmases, it is that present dispositions may have their roots in past experience but they can still be changed for the sake of a better future. Brad and Kate’s anti-marriage, anti-family, anti-children and anti-commitment outlook obviously sprung from unprocessed issues in their younger, living-with-their-families years. And the viewer, seeing how each divorced parent behaves, may even conclude that the parents’ own flaws as young people had been carried over to adulthood and then became a burden not only on themselves but for their children as well. Thus the stream of mediocrity flows—but the conversion in one character seems to signal a change in their destructive “family tradition”. Add to this the realization of a reflective parent who has learned from several divorces and now emphasizes the value of family. The movie is rich in topics to explore with your own family, and you can challenge your teenagers to defend their answers to these questions: Do the actions in the movie harmonize with the message it is trying to send? Do you find similarities between your parents and the parents in this movie? What would you do if you were one of the siblings in the movie?

Pride and Glory

Cast: Colin Farrell, Edward Norton, Jon Voight, Noah Emmerich, Jennifer Ehle; Director: Gavin O'Connor; Producer: Greg O’Connor; Screenwriters: Joe Carnahan & Gavin O'Connor; Music: Mark Isham; Editors: Lisa Zeno Churgin, John Gilroy; Genre: Drama/ Action; Cinematography: Declan Quinn; Distributor: New Line Cinema; Location: USA; Running Time: 125 min.;

Technical Assessment: 3
Moral Assessment: 2.5
CINEMA Rating: For mature viewers 18 and above

NYPD Det. Ray Tierney (Edward Norton) hails from a family of cops. His father, Francis Sr. (Jon Voight) is the chief of police of Manhattan, and his brother, Francis, Jr. (Noah Emmerich) and brother-in-law Jimmy (Collin Farrel) are also on the force. Ray, who has been on semi-exile, goes back to the service upon the request of his father to investigate the murder of the four policemen who are all his Francis Jr.’s men. Ray’s investigation leads him to suspect Jimmy as the murder’s culprit that further reveals more secrets complicating their family’s name and intertwined blood relationships.

The first part of the movie is quite impressive with various new elements put into an otherwise familiar cop story. However, as the movie reaches its climax, it resorted to a contrived plot that jeopardizes the entire movie and makes it a letdown. There are even some subplots that are quite irrelevant to the story like the dying wife of Francis Jr. that neither moved the story forward nor added tension to the plot. The ensemble of topnotch actors led by Norton and Farrell saved the day. Although they are predictably good actors, they still never fail to surprise their audience with the kind of depth and sensitivity they bring into their characters.

Perhaps it is expected of the genre to have more than a hundred times mention of the “F” word with sometimes sexual implications and racial discrimination, but the same reason makes the movie distasteful and not fit for viewers younger than 18. The violence in the movie, although in context, may still result in a desensitizing effect on audiences who are susceptible to media influence. One particular scene where Jimmy threatens to burn a baby with flat iron is offensive and emotionally stressful. The policemen’s integrity is once again put into question in the movie. In Pride and Glory, the men in uniform could be drug dealers, money launderers, robbers, or liars. Is it right to conceal the truth in the name of pride and glory? Does the end justify the means? These are some of the moral questions in the movie that are left for the audience to answer. But then again, in the end, those who have sinned are punished and the least evil ends up to be the last man standing.

Scaregivers

Cast: Jose Manalo, Wally Bayola, Iza Calzado, Paolo Contis, Ehra Madrigal, Edgar Allen de Guzman; Director: Uro Q. dela Cruz; Producers: Antonio P. Tuviera, Marvic Sotto; Screenwriter: Jourdan Sebastian; Music: Vince de Jesus; Editor: Reggie Gulle; Genre: Comedy/ Horror; Cinematography: ; Distributor: APT Entertainment; Location: Philippines; Running Time: 110min.;

Technical Assessment: 3
Moral Assessment: 2.5
CINEMA Rating: For viewers 14 and above

Nagnakaw ng mamahaling pares ng singsing sa isang tindahan ng alahas sina Billy (Jose Manalo) at Bob(Wally Bayola). Pero dahil sa kanilang kapalpakan, sila ay mahuhuli ng pulis at makukulong. Ngunit hindi pa rin nila isasauli ang ninakaw na singsing. Upang maiwasan ang tuluyan nilang sentensiya, magpapanggap sina Billy at Bob na mga baliw. Maniniwala ng hukom at sila ay ilalagak sa isang mental hospital. Ang buong akala nilang dalawa ay tapos na ang kanilang problema, ngunit malalaman nilang sa ospital na pinagdalhan sa kanila ay may pinaniniwalaang multo na pumapatay ng mga nurse at ilang piling pasyente. Silang dalawa ay balak ring patayin. Mabuti na lang at may makikilala nila si Marcia (Iza Calzado) na isang caregiver sa ospital. Tutulungan sila nito na makatakas ngunit malalaman nilang ang pumapatay pala ay dati niyang kasintahan. Ano kaya ang lihim ni Marcia at ng ospital? Makatakas pa kayang talaga sila Billy at Bob?

Isang nakakaaliw na pelikula ang Scaregivers. Bagama’t mga baguhang bida sina Jose Manalo at Wally Bayola, nagawa nilang dalhin ang buong pelikula. Hindi rin naman matatawaran ang husay ng mga pangalawang tauhan. Maayos naman ang daloy ng kuwento at may istorya naman na maaring sundan. Yun nga lang, hindi pa rin nila maiwasan ang paggamit ng mga lumang joke lalo na ng mga toilet humors na masyado nang naging palasak at kadalasa’y hindi na nakakatawa. Halata ring nagkulang sa research ang pelikula lalo pagdating sa pag-proseso ng mga kasong kriminal at pangangalaga ng mga pasyente sa mental hospital. Pawang hindi nito naipakita ng maayos ang tunay na pamamalakad sa institusyon. Maayos naman ang special effects maging ang tunog at pag-iilaw. Maaring hilaw at kulang pa sa mga bagong elemento pero pasado na rin kung tutuusin para sa dalawang baguhan pa lamang sa larangan ng pagpapatawa.

Ipinakita sa pelikula na maaaring magbago ang kahit sino basta’t bukal ito sa kalooban at hindi napipilitan lang. Lahat ng sinumang nagkasala ay may pagkakataon pa ring umangat sa buhay at magkaroon ng pag-asa basta’t magsisikap at tuluyang tatalikuran ang maling gawain. Ngunit maraming ipinakita sa pelikula na labis na nakababaha lalo na sa batang manonood. Una ay ang paggamit sa pangalan ng Diyos at sa pagdarasal bago gawin ang pagnanakaw. Maaring isipin na tama ang ganitong gawain. Pangalawa ay ang ilang mga bastos na uri ng patawa lalo na yung patungkol na naman sa katawan ng kababaihan. Parati na lang bang pantasyang sekswal ang mga kababaihan sa pelikula? Nagbibigay ito ng kalituhan sa papel na ginagampanan ng mga kababaihan sa lipunan. Nariyan din ang isteryotipikal na paglalarawan sa ilang lahi tulad ng mga Tsino at Indian. Sa mga ganitong bagay, kinakailangang gabayan ang mga batang manonood.

Bolt

Cast: (Voices) John Travolta, Susie Essman, Miley Cyrus, Malcolm McDowell; Directors: Byron Howard, Chris Williams; Producer: Clark Spencer; Screenwriters: Dan Fogelman, Chris Williams; Music: John Powell; Editor: Joey Ingram; Animators: Joey Ingram, Josh Mahan;Genre: CGI Comedy; Distributor: Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures Philippines; Location: USA; Running Time: 100 min.;

Technical Assessment: 3.5
Moral Assessment: 3
CINEMA Rating: For viewers of all ages

The pooch Bolt (voice of John Travolta) and Penny (voice of Miley Cyrus) are co-stars in a weekly action television show that has them battling the evil scientist Dr. Calico (voice of Malcolm McDowell). In the TV show, Bolt is a super-dog, with stare that melts steel and a sonic-boom bark that can wipe out an entire fleet of armor helicopters, but he doesn’t know it’s just a show. The dog truly believes he has super-canine powers, as he is carefully isolated in his cage and prevented from living a normal life outside of the film set. To please an adult audience that has gotten tired of the show’s happy endings, the network boss Mindy (voice of Kari Wahlgren) orders the Director (voice of James Lipton) to change his endings or he’d get fired. The Director then ends one episode with the villain Dr. Calico kidnapping Penny—something that Bolt takes for real. Bolt then escapes to rescue Penny, to be joined in time by the Mafiosi cat Mittens (voice of Sussie Essman) and the TV-watching hamster Rhino (voice of Mark Walton). In his self-assigned mission of rescuing his co-star, Bolt is shocked to discover that he has no superpowers after all.

Directors Chris Williams and Byron Howard see to it that all the elements of an animated adventure are present in Bolt. The plot is simple but credible, the CGI enhances the story, the characters so alive with their human qualities well projected by the just-right artistic rendering, etc. The chase scene is particularly impressive and can be thrilling to both young and adult audiences. If the viewer pays attention to the dialogue, he will see familiar characters in real life

There are many lessons to be learned in Bolt as the viewer—whether or not he goes for talking animals— becomes a “co-journeyer” of the dog in his self-revealing experiences. The movie is a modern-day parable about growing up, shedding the innocence (or naivete) of childhood, learning to trust change, others, and oneself as one wakes up to reality and sees that the world is not all pink candy floss and honey. There is something both pathetic and endearing about the Bolt character: he is a victim of exploitation, raised and trained to believe he is much more than he really is. In a way he is deceived and is bewildered to discover he is an ordinary dog, thus is greatly hurt when he is replaced in the set by a look-alike because the show must go on. This story says much of the movie world where “stars” are created by their publicists and made to believe they are much more than they really are—because it is what fans want. The movie offers food for thought and contains no objectionable material.

Twilight

Cast: Robert Pattinson, Kristen Stewart, Billy Burke, Ashley Greene, Peter Pacinelli; Director: Catherine Hardwicke; Producers: Wyck Godfrey, Greg Mooradian, Mark Morgan; Screenwriters: Melissa Rosenberg, Stephenie Meyer; Music: Carter Burwell; Editor: Nancy Richardson; Genre: Drama/ Fantasy/ Romance/ Thriller; Cinematography: Elliot Davis; Distributor: Viva Films; Location: Washington, USA; Running Time: 122 min.;

Technical Assessment: 3
Moral Assessment: 3
CINEMA Rating: For viewers age 13 and below with parental guidance

Twilight is a movie adaptation from Stephanie Meyer’s series. After 17-year-old Bella Swan’s (Kristen Stewart) mother remarries, she is sent off to live with her father Charlie (Billy Burke) in the small town of Forks Washington. She becomes attracted to a mysterious classmate Edward Cullen (Robert Pattinson), who is actually a 108-year-old vampire resembling a teenager. Edward’s genteel and gracious ways endear him all the more to Bella and despite trying to resist the mutual attraction. The two teenagers fall deeply in love with each other. The Cullen family’s loyalty and ethics are put to test when the nomadic vampires arrive and endanger the life of Bella.

Most movie adaptations of great novels end up disappointing and wanting. This movie is no different with interpretation of Edward and Bella’s characters lacking in depth and the struggle of the Cullen family to co-exist with the humans downplayed. However, as a romantic fantasy for teenagers, the movie succeeds in connecting with the target viewers and eliciting enough sympathy and fondness. The production is decent with an imaginative camerawork, tight editing and impressive CGIs. The production design and the music successfully deliver the Gothic romance it intends. Overall, the movie is quite enjoyable and respectably moving.

One’s background does not necessarily spell the kind of person he is to become. The Cullens are vampires and by nature they are violent, blood-thirsty and heartless but instead, they are doing their very best to be decent, loving, and caring as is humanly possible. In the same manner, regardless of one’s root, family history, psychological background and personal past, the kind of person one will turn out to be depends on himself and his desire to choose what is good and right as opposed to what is expected by society.

The movie, though not objectionable, has several short but intense action violence, mild sensuality and some sexual references, and may not be acceptable for younger teens. Young audiences need to be guided by their parents as some scenes and dialogues are not appropriate for them.